Panels / Mito Red Light / MitoPOD
MitoPOD
660 / 810 / 830 nm · 2320 LEDs · 97 W
Brand claims 30 mW/cm² at contact - not comparable.
| Type | Full body |
|---|---|
| Wavelengths | 660, 810, 830 nm |
| Normalized irradiance @ 15 cm | n/a |
| Coverage area | 21600 cm² |
| Total power draw | 97 W |
| LED count | 2320 |
| EMF @ 15 cm | 0 mG |
| Flicker | 0% |
| Pulsing | none |
| Third-party tested | Yes |
| Certifications | FDA-registered, ETL |
| Warranty | 1 years |
| Made in | Not disclosed |
| App control | No |
| Data completeness | 100% |
MitoPOD review
We have not had this panel on a bench. Everything below is its published specs measured against the 101 panels in the database - irradiance normalized to 15 cm, price and coverage compared with the other 42 full body panels in its class.
What it does well
- Large treatment area for its class at 21600 cm².
- Brand publishes third-party test results rather than in-house numbers only.
- Effectively flicker-free at 0%.
- EMF measured at 0 mG at 15 cm.
Where it loses
- Mito Red Light publishes no usable irradiance figure for this panel (a number with no measurement distance), so its output cannot be compared with panels that do.
Cannot be ranked on light per dollar
Mito Red Light publishes no irradiance figure for this panel that can be normalized to 15 cm, so it cannot be put in the light-per-dollar running against panels that do. Judge it on coverage, wavelengths, build and warranty.
MitoPOD FAQ
Is the MitoPOD worth it?
Mito Red Light does not publish an irradiance figure that can be normalized to 15 cm for this panel, so it cannot be scored on light per dollar. At $1699 it is judged on coverage, wavelengths and warranty alone.
Similar full body panels
| Panel | Irr @15cm | Coverage | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BON CHARGE Super Max | n/a | 2730 cm² | $1599 | compare → |
| PlatinumLED BIOMAX PRO Ultra | 121 | 2787 cm² | $1599 | compare → |
| Red Light Rising Advantage 900 | 86 | 2730 cm² | $1822 | compare → |